Peer Review Policy – Journal of Medical Food and Nutrition (JMN)

The Journal of Medical Food and Nutrition (JMN) is committed to maintaining the highest standards of scientific quality, integrity, and transparency in its publication process. All manuscripts submitted to JMN undergo a rigorous, double-blind peer review process to ensure accuracy, originality, and relevance.

1. Overview

• Double-Blind Review: The identities of both authors and reviewers are concealed throughout the review process.

• Number of Reviewers: Each manuscript is reviewed by at least two independent experts in the relevant field.

• Editorial Oversight: The Editor-in-Chief, with the assistance of Section Editors, makes the final decision based on reviewers’ reports and the journal’s editorial policies.

2. Peer Review Steps

​

Step 1 – Initial Editorial Assessment

• Upon submission, the Editorial Office screens manuscripts for scope, formatting compliance, plagiarism check (similarity index < 15%), and adherence to ethical standards.

• Manuscripts that do not meet basic requirements may be returned to authors without external review.

Step 2 – Reviewer Selection

• Reviewers are selected based on subject expertise, academic qualifications, and lack of conflicts of interest.

• Review invitations are sent with a clear timeline (usually 2–3 weeks for review completion).

Step 3 – Review Process

• Reviewers assess the manuscript for:

  • Originality and novelty

  • Scientific rigor and methodology

  • Ethical compliance

  • Clarity of writing and data presentation

  • Relevance to the journal’s scope

• Reviewers provide constructive feedback and recommend: Accept, Minor Revision, Major Revision, or Reject.

Step 4 – Editorial Decision

• The Editor-in-Chief considers reviewer recommendations and makes a final decision.

• Authors receive detailed reviewer comments and guidance for revisions, if applicable.

Step 5 – Revision and Re-Review

• Revised manuscripts are re-evaluated by the same reviewers (when possible) to ensure all concerns are addressed.

Step 6 – Final Acceptance and Proofing

• Once accepted, manuscripts are copyedited for grammar, style, and formatting.

• Authors review proofs before publication.

3. Review Ethics & Confidentiality

• Reviewers must treat manuscripts as confidential documents and must not share or discuss them without permission from the Editorial Office.

• Reviewers are required to declare any conflicts of interest before accepting a review assignment.

4. Appeals and Complaints

• Authors may appeal editorial decisions by writing to the Editor-in-Chief, providing clear justification and evidence.

• Complaints about the review process will be investigated in line with COPE guidelines.

5. Recognition of Reviewers

• JMN values the contribution of peer reviewers and may acknowledge them annually on the journal website (with their consent).

• ​

Contact for Peer Review Queries:
Editorial Office – Journal of Medical Food and Nutrition
Email: jmn@ismnworld.org
Website: www.jmnworld.com